Case №001 REFUTED

“The strategy wins 68% of trades”

Source: a promotional return screenshot with no costs accounted for.

What the stand showed

Wins claimed

68%

Actual on the stand

29%

Result

a loss

after fees and slippage

The claim

A signal seller promised 68% profitable trades and steady income.

What the stand showed

On honest data with fees and slippage (the gap between the expected and the real fill price), the share of profitable trades fell to 29%. The claimed return only held under ideal, cost-free conditions.

Verdict

Refuted. Real conditions turn a “profitable” strategy into a losing one.

Seal · verify it yourself

Seal in preparation

This early case predates our public seal pipeline, so no Bitcoin timestamp was issued for it. Newer verdicts are sealed: a SHA-256 fixes the report’s content and an OpenTimestamps stamp fixes its date in Bitcoin — so a verdict can’t be quietly rewritten after the fact.

How sealing works →